User talk:OldeWolf

Welcome!

Hello, OldeWolf, and welcome to the Ouroboros Portal! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Feel free to fill out your personal user page so we can get to know you. There is a collection of Userboxes you can easily add there. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Don't forget to drop by and introduce yourself in the forum. It will require a separate registration (login and password), but most users use the same username in both places. There's even an RSS Feed, if you're into that.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page or ask on the forums and someone will try to to answer your questions shortly.

Also, make sure you take a look at the Help page. There are a lot of preloaded images, missions, and contact info templates, and what you want to add might already be there.

Again, welcome! -- Eabrace 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Image Category

I saw you've uploaded some images, so in order for you to keep them together and easier to search for, I added the Category:OldeWolf Images and Category:UserOldeWolf categories. The first is for images, and the second is for anything you'd like it to be for. :) -- ~ AGGE talk/cons 06:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Images

All those images you "added" for Ouroboros Portal already exist on the ParagonWiki. Ouro utilizes a "shared repository" for images. They don't need to be categorized over here. I am going to "remove" (decategorize on Ouro) the ones you "brought over". ~ AGGE talk/cons 00:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Categories

I'm not entirely sure what you're partial categorization attempt was there, but the alignment categories (i.e. villain) do not necessary directly align with the character creation categories (i.e. Freedom Villains). A character can be, through roleplaying, something other than their creation type (some people do not opt into the alignment change system). Therefore, the character creation categories should not be children of the alignment categories, since one does not necessarily mean the other.

For future wholesale changes on categorization or images or other such, I suggest bringing your suggestions up on our forums for consensus first. Thanks! ~ AGGE talk/cons 07:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

My appologies, that seemed to be a logical extension of how those categories worked since no documentation to the contrary was provided within the category pages.

- OldeWolf 15:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)